Lumbar Stabilization: Improving Hip & Thoracic Mobility


 
In my last two blogs, I suggested principles of Optimal Movement we could be teaching our patients:
•    Fascio-Skeletal Weight Bearing 

•    Appropriate Distribution of Movement 

•    Proportional Use of Synergists 

•    Minimization of Unnecessary Effort 


I would now like get more specific by talking about the 800 pound gorilla of physical therapy; low back pain. According to that font of all medical wisdom, the internet, low back pain is the third most common reason for a doctor visit in the US. Coming out of PT school in 1983, lumbar stabilization wasn’t even on the radar screen. We stretched the back into flexion (William’s), extension (McKenzie’s), side-bending and rotation, then strengthened the back and belly muscles. The back hurt because it was stiff and weak; it would feel better if it were flexible and strong. A brief perusal of back pain books on Amazon will show that old ideas die hard; the stretch and strengthen paradigm is still alive and kicking. 
 
Fast forward to the Age of Pilates and we have the more accurate idea that the back can hurt because of hypermobility. However, we tend to still have “if only” concepts of what it takes to stabilize the back. “If only” your multifidi and transverse abdominus were stronger you won’t have back pain. Hmmm. Even if you still sit habitually slumped at end-range flexion? Even if you still stand sway backed at end-range extension? If you twist with inadequate hip or thoracic rotation? If you bend with inadequate hip hinge? If you serve in tennis with a stiff thoracic kyphosis? There are larger forces at play in these scenarios which need to be addressed, along with a self-awareness component; what am I doing wrong/how could I move better? 
 
Optimal movement principles germane to this topic are Appropriate Distribution of Movement and Proportional Use of Synergists. If your gluts/hams are tight and you are not using your hip flexors to prevent your pelvis from falling back into posterior tilt in sitting, you slump and over- stretch posteriorly. If your hip flexors are tight and you are not using your hip extensors to prevent your pelvis from falling forward into anterior tilt in standing, you lordose and jam. If your hip rotators are short you twist too much at your lower back when golfing or working on an assembly line. If your thoracic spine has fossilized and the thoracic extensors are on permanent holiday, where might these deficits be made up? 
 
There is current research that backs this up. For just a few examples, go to PubMed and type in: 

•    Relationship between the hip and low back pain in athletes who participate in rotation- related sports 

•    Hip stiffness patterns in lumbar flexion or extension-based movement syndromes 

•    Elimination of intermittent chronic low back pain in a recreational golfer following improvement of hip range of motion impairments. 

•    The hips influence on low back pain: a distal link to a proximal problem. 

•    Factors affecting shoulder-pelvic integration during axial trunk rotation is subjects with 
recurrent low back pain. 

•    The myth of core stability. 


We’re not tossing out the baby with the bath water; core muscle activation has an important role, just not the only role. The game here would be to create situations where we simultaneously mobilize hips and thorax while keeping the back stable. This is much easier said than done; the types of exercise we have historically prescribed to improve hip or thoracic mobility are non- specific/global instead of pattern-specific/differentiated (more on these terms in the next blog). Because of the tendency to move in “paths of least resistance”, we need to be clever in how we position our patient to constrain lumbar movement and funnel movement and effort to under- performing areas.
Furthermore, our exercises should be linked to the specific functional contexts in which our patients run into trouble (bending, lifting, pushing, etc.) and should have a sensory training aspect; shape of the low back, location of movement or effort, etc. Motor adequacy (muscle length/strength), Sensory accuracy (proprioceptive acuity) and Intentional clarity (what’s my target) are the three indispensible aspects of human integrated movement; we can and should be including all three.

Location: Seattle, WA, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mechanic or Coach: The Role of the Rehab Professional

Image
  My father-in-law, a retired auto mechanic and professional curmudgeon, drives an early 80’s Pontiac and whiles away his time with an ancient Model T. Why does he drive a 30 year old car? Because in the mid 80’s auto manufacturers began installing computers in cars and now he can’t work on anything but the older models. He can twiddle a wrench or drive a screw, tighten a belt or adjust a spark plug gap with the best of them, but doesn’t have the tools or knowledge to work with control systems.  Having come out of PT school in 1983, I was trained somewhat mechanistically. We mobilized joints to improve joint play and arthrokinematics. We utilized tissue release techniques to improve fascial mobility and range of motion. We prescribed exercises to stretch or strengthen individual muscles. We used muscle energy techniques, strain/counter-strain and other techniques to move or align vertebrae.  What we didn’t think of then, and are still in our infancy...
Read more

Principles of Optimal Movement II: Appropriate Movement Distribution & Proportional Use of Synergists

Image
The last blog, Principles of Optimal Movement I, introduced the rehabilitation goal of movement optimization. This was defined and its’ importance in rehabilitation was articulated. Four principles of optimal movement were proposed: ·    Fascio-Skeletal Weight-Bearing 
 ·    Minimization of Unnecessary Effort 
 ·    Appropriate Distribution of Movement 
 ·    Proportional Use of Synergists 
 Fascio-skeletal weight-bearing and minimization of unnecessary effort were covered previously; appropriate distribution of movement and proportional use of synergists are the topics of this blog. 
 The emerging rehabilitation principle of regional interdependence is defined as “seemingly unrelated impairments in remote anatomical regions of the body may contribute to and be associated with a patient’s primary report of symptoms.” (See excellent article in J. of Man. & Manip Ther. May 2013; 21(2):90-102. A regional interdependence m...
Read more

Principles of Optimal Movement I: Fascio-Skeletal Weight Bearing & Minimization of Effort

Image
The concept of “movement optimization” and the assignment of this role to rehabilitation professionals were previously introduced. It was suggested that if we embrace the role of movement teacher or coach we are obliged to answer two questions; what do we want to teach and how do we want to teach it? How do we define optimal movement and what are the characteristics of exercises we use that make them informational, that facilitate patient recognition of sub-optimal movement as well as an organic selection of more optimal movement and postural choices?  What is the definition of optimal? Best, most favorable or most desirable. Notice that these are subjective/qualitative terms. We are not asked to transform society (as per 2013 APTA vision) by improving goniometric measurements or manual muscle testing scores, but by improving quality of movement. While quantitative movement characteristics (how many, how much, how far and how long) are an aspect of well-organized move...
Read more